![]() Using flag -log-level debug I’ve found out that datalad called git annex get as it should be. UPD: On server I have Datalad 0.15.1, git-annex 8.20211028-g581d4e9 and Ubuntu 18.04.6Ĭurrent results of my attempts to find the source of the problem git-annex is a distributed file synchronization system written in Haskell. DATALAD Set default backend for all files to be MD5E. I’ve also tryied Ubuntu 20.04.2 with the same result. Beyond DataLad itself, the installation requires Python, Git, git-annex, and potentially Pythons. What version of DataLad am I using (run datalad -version)? On what operating system (consider running datalad wtf)?Ĭurrently I am using DataLad version 0.15.4, and git-annex version 8.20211118-g23ee48898 on client. #datalad get sub-00/ses-post/anat/sub-00_ses-post_ Ive just been reading the documentation trying to get my mind around it. On client i’ve run the following commands: #datalad install -s repodir So at the following this computational server will be mentioned as “client” (machine where I need data from datalad repo), and local machine (where dataset is physically situated) will be mentioned as “server”. Property Value Operating system: Linux: Distribution: Arch Linux: Repository: Arch Linux Community x8664 Official: Package filename: .zst: Package name: git-annex: Package version: 10. Most backends are different kinds of hashes. git-annex - Manage files with git, without checking their contents into git. “Remote” repo is situated on my local machine, and i run datalad get after connecting to my server through ssh (where i have the reverce access to my local machine). The 'backend' in git-annex controls how a key is generated from a files content and/or filesystem metadata. ![]() Where sub-00/ses-post/anat/sub-00_ses-post_ is a file, which I’ve been trying to download. Get(error): sub-00/ses-post/anat/sub-00_ses-post_ (file) ![]() I’ve been trying to download data from my remote repo using datalad get /path/to/file and obtained the following uninformative output:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |